Introduction to Google’s Search Relations Team
Google’s Search Relations team has been working to help people understand how to optimize their websites for search engines. However, their advice often sounds vague or comes with conditions, such as "it depends." In a recent podcast, team members Martin Splitt and Gary Illyes shared the challenges that prevent them from providing clear-cut answers.
The Challenges of Providing Clear-Cut Answers
The discussion was part of what the team referred to as a "more human episode." The Googlers acknowledged they sometimes come across as robotic and used this episode to show a more human side. Splitt works as Google’s bridge between developers and SEO professionals. He provided an example of how good advice can be distorted when people overlook the broader context. At a Tech SEO Summit, he presented a slide with a bold statement about JavaScript performance. To prevent confusion, he added a note stating that the slide lacked context and provided a full explanation during the talk.
The Context Problem
But even with that, he said the statement still got pulled out and repeated on its own. He clarified that JavaScript plays an important role in many web experiences, like enabling offline support. But that nuance often gets lost when single lines are quoted in isolation. This loss of context is one reason why Google teams don’t typically share their presentation slides. Illyes confirmed that slides on their own can be misleading, stating "Our slides without context, they are useless." The team sees what happens when advice meant for one specific situation gets used everywhere. This can hurt websites that have different needs.
Why Google Doesn’t Share Slides
For example, advice that works for a small local business might be wrong for a global company with websites in multiple languages. Both Google reps know the SEO community gets frustrated with "it depends" answers. Splitt even called it his "pet peeve." But they explained why they can’t give simple yes-or-no answers. Splitt noted, "Someone who is serving a very specific niche with highly regulated content in a single country in a single language might have very different requirements than a multilanguage multinational brand that sells everything to everyone."
The "It Depends" Situation
They try to give more complete answers by explaining what factors matter. But this makes their advice longer and more complex. The Google team also worries about how people use their quotes. Splitt said people often pick one statement while ignoring other important information. Splitt explained, "It often makes things tricky because people might cherry pick and might pick one thing you said, take that out of context and use it as an example why people should follow their agenda rather than ours." While they know public statements can be quoted freely, both reps feel bad when selective quoting gets out of control.
What This Means
The Google team’s openness about their struggles affirms the experience of many SEO professionals. Google’s guidance often feels cautious because it needs to account for a wide range of use cases. Instead of seeking simple answers, focus on the factors that influence Google’s recommendations. Understanding the "why" behind Google’s advice is more useful than chasing one-size-fits-all solutions.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Google’s Search Relations team is working hard to provide helpful advice to the SEO community. However, their advice often sounds vague or comes with conditions because of the complexity of the issues they are addressing. By understanding the challenges they face and the context in which they provide their advice, we can better appreciate the value of their guidance and use it to improve our own websites and online presence. Listen to the full podcast episode to learn more about the team’s thoughts and experiences.