Monday, December 1, 2025

How People Really Use...

Introduction to LLMs Large Language Models (LLMs) have been gaining popularity, and a recent...

From Idea to Article:...

Blogging is an exciting way to express yourself, share your ideas, and connect...

10 Essential On-Page SEO...

What is On-Page SEO? On-page SEO refers to the techniques used to optimize a...

5 Simple Steps to...

Blogging is an amazing way to express yourself and share your thoughts with...
HomeSEOLLMs Comparable to...

LLMs Comparable to Keywords Meta Tag

Introduction to LLMs.txt

Google’s John Mueller has shared his thoughts on LLMs.txt, a proposed standard for showing website content to AI agents and crawlers. He downplayed its usefulness, comparing it to the keywords meta tag, which is no longer used by search engines. This comparison is based on the idea that LLMs.txt is not a reliable way to control how AI bots crawl a website.

What is LLMs.txt?

LLMs.txt is often compared to robots.txt, but this comparison is incorrect. While robots.txt is used to control how bots crawl a website, LLMs.txt is used to show content to large language models (LLMs) in a specific format. This format uses markdown language, which is human and machine-readable, to indicate headings, lists, and other content elements. The purpose of LLMs.txt is to provide a simplified version of a web page’s content, without advertising and navigation, to AI bots.

Key Points About LLMs.txt

  • LLMs.txt is not a way to control AI bots.
  • LLMs.txt is a way to show the main content to AI bots.
  • LLMs.txt is just a proposal and not a widely used and accepted standard.

The Usefulness of LLMs.txt

John Mueller’s comments on LLMs.txt suggest that it is not a useful standard. He pointed out that none of the major AI services, including Google, have announced support for LLMs.txt. This means that even if a website uses LLMs.txt, it is unlikely to have any impact on how AI bots crawl and index the site. Mueller also noted that using LLMs.txt could be redundant, as AI bots can already crawl and index website content directly.

- Advertisement -

Comparison to Keywords Meta Tag

Mueller compared LLMs.txt to the keywords meta tag, which was once used to tell search engines what keywords a website was relevant for. However, this tag was eventually abandoned because it was too easy for website owners to spam and manipulate. Similarly, LLMs.txt could be used to show one set of content to AI bots and another set to users and search engines, which could lead to spam and cloaking.

Conclusion

In conclusion, LLMs.txt is a proposed standard for showing website content to AI agents and crawlers, but its usefulness is limited. John Mueller’s comments suggest that it is not a reliable way to control how AI bots crawl a website, and it may be redundant or even lead to spam. As a result, website owners and SEOs should be cautious when using LLMs.txt and focus on creating high-quality, relevant content that can be crawled and indexed by AI bots and search engines directly.

- Advertisement -

Latest Articles

- Advertisement -

Continue reading

Pragmatic Approach To AI Search Visibility

Introduction to AI Search The way people search for information online is changing. Bing recently published a blog post about how clicks from AI Search are improving conversion rates. This shift in consumer behavior is significant, and it's essential to...

ChatGPT Gets Shopping & What Drives AI Citations

Introduction to the Week's Pulse The world of search engine optimization (SEO) and artificial intelligence (AI) is constantly evolving. This week, several updates and studies have been released that affect how product discovery works, what drives visibility in ChatGPT, and...

Google’s Mueller Says Sites In A ‘Bad State’ May Need To Start Over

Google's Advice on Low-Quality AI Content Introduction to the Issue Google's John Mueller has shared his thoughts on what sites with low-quality AI content should do to improve. Instead of spending time manually rewriting every page, Mueller suggests that these sites...

Top Factors Influencing ChatGPT Citations

Introduction to ChatGPT Citation Factors SE Ranking analyzed 129,000 unique domains across 216,524 pages in 20 niches to identify which factors correlate with ChatGPT citations. The study aimed to understand what makes a website more likely to be cited by...